NBC's gross out show Fear Factor has network brass in a tizzy over an upcoming episode where contestants must drink donkey semen.
I am mystified as to why this is a big deal all of a sudden. Haven't the news and/or cable divisions of NBC been practicing this exact same act on their donkey friends in the Democrat party for the past five decades? And they weren't even drinking it from a glass!
All jokes aside, this post dovetails nicely with my last one. What the Hell is wrong with our culture today? Who would willingly subject themselves to something like this privately, much less on a worldwide TV broadcast? Is there no shame?
Take a look at these two recent YouTube clips and tell me something's not rotting at the core of our culture.
The first clip is a man being confronted by police at a Carl's Jr. restaurant. He repeatedly refuses to cooperate, shrugs off the taser, then moves to swing a metal tool of some kind at one of the officers and is shot dead.
Someone gets shot ten times right in front of you and you giggle hysterically? Really?
The second clip shows an elderly woman driving in the median of the highway. Apparently she was having some sort of medical issue which caused her to be confused.
"I wanna see what happens when they get to the bridge! Ha ha ha!"
Now both clips are breathtaking to watch, and I'm not suggesting that people shouldn't watch YouTube, but when did it become commonplace for Americans to laugh at people who are suffering?
[...] it might say nothing more than Republican voters looking at the political environment of 2012 and deciding — rightly or wrongly — that “abrasive loose cannon” is a marginally better brand than “animatronic plutocrat.”
Animatronic plutocrat! LMAO! So true, and so much more descriptive than bland, boring, uninspiring, and milquetoast.
We need to improve public health by raising taxes on cigarettes and fatty foods.
So you think raising taxes on these behavors will discourage them and cause people to pursue other activities?
Yes I do.
Do you also support raising taxes on capital gains and corporate profits?
Certainly.
And you don't think that will discourage savings, investment and job creation?
Well... that's different, because it's about fairness.
So people getting laid off and/or not being able to find a job is something you support as long as the byproduct of their misery is that it allowed you the satisfaction of poking someone wealthier than you in the eye?
...pretty much.
And you don't care about the suffering of those who lost their jobs,their homes, or even their family?
Oh no, I do care. That's why I voted for the candidate who supports increased spending on food assistance, public housing, drug rehabilitation, suicide prevention and extended unemployment benefits. :)
Wherein Newt Gingrich shows us why he's the one best equipped to kick Obama's ass in a Presidential debate.
Standing ovation? Now that's something you don't see very often in a debate.
I just don't get why we'd want to put some milquetoast candidate like Romney or Santorum up against Øbama, when we could have a brawler like this man blow him away with the whole world watching.
"They are murderers and terrorists that think nothing of blowing up soldiers, civilians, women and children. What have they done to deserve our respect?
There are Marines being killed and maimed on a daily basis by these people. They are flying in from Muslim countries all over the world to get their crack at martyrdom.
If some Marine that fought them in battle fair and square feels that he has the right to urinate on a defeated enemy, what is the problem? Hell, it could be worse…. It is a fight to the death, not some sort of gentlemanly duel with seconds and everyone very politely drinking a fine wine afterwards." -Army Sgt. Maj. Herb Freidman
And he dared to utter this non-PC view on MSNBC? Wish I'd have seen that, the host of the program probably passed out from shock.
[...] I do not recall any self-righteous indignation when our Delta snipers Shugart and Gordon had their bodies dragged through Mogadishu. Neither do I recall media outrage and condemnation of our Blackwater security contractors being killed, their bodies burned, and hung from a bridge in Fallujah. All these over-emotional pundits and armchair quarterbacks need to chill. Does anyone remember the two Soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division who were beheaded and gutted in Iraq?
No sir, selective outrage is a specialty of today's Western liberal media elite. They caterwaul only when it fits their template.
Folks, do we want to defeat Obama in 2012 or not? Do we want to run a safe candidate, or a successful one? Do we want to be Mr. Nice Guy, or Mr. President?
In order to defeat Obama, his billion dollars of campaign cash, and the 95% of TV and print media that is chomping at the bit to tilt the news coverage in the favor of Democrats, we'll need to do something in 2012 that no other GOP candidate has done in decades... kick ass.
Now, I've got nothing against Mitt Romney. If he ends up winning the nomination I will strongly support him; however, I don't believe Romney is different enough from previous GOP candidates to really take the fight to Obama & Co. Romney is Mr. Nice Guy. Romney is safe. We don't need nice and safe, we need to a champion, and Newt Gingrich is a rhetorical gladiator of the highest order.
Nice and safe Republicans try to make the media their friends, like McCain did. How'd that work out for us?
Nice and safe Republicans accept Democrat mischaracterizations and try to turn them to our advantage, like Bush's "compassionate conservatism" meme. Wow, was that a dumb move, you could almost hear America saying "Well I guess those other conservatives really were heartless like the Democrats said."
Nice and safe Republicans meekly follow the lead of the liberal media and step right into their bear traps, like Sarah Palin. You think Newt would have answered that question about what papers he reads? He'd have looked the reporter in his face and told him to stop asking such stupid questions.
Here's a great example of what I'm talking about, the "pious baloney" moment from the New Hampshire debate. Can anyone find me a clip of Romney going for the jugular like this? Or Santorum? Or Ron Paul?
This is like Reagan turning the table on Mondale over the age issue. One knockout punch turned the MSM/DNC cabal's narrative on it's head, made the Democrat look like a fool, and the GOP won a landslide victory.
The debates are our chance to get past the filter of the liberal media bias and speak directly to the American people. The debates are our chance to take down a President so buoyed by the willful ignorance of his followers that he maintains a 44% approval rating despite presiding over the worst debt and unemployment rates in decades.
Newt excels at this stuff. Here he is making ABC News look like chumps:
If Sarah Palin would have done something like this her political career would be soaring right now, instead she's still trying to combat America's first impression of her, which courtesy the MSM/DNC cabal was that of a bimbo unqualified to hold office. We can't afford to keep making those kinds of mistakes folks.
Newt Gingrich is the only candidate I see who has the skills to rhetorically kick the ass of Obama, the entire Democrat party, and their allies in the media. This is how we can turn back the tide and start a new movement like Reagan did in the 80's, or Gingrich (hey, look at that!) did in the 90's. Nice and safe won't cut it next year. Nice and safe means Obama pulls out a win and we spend four more years being painted as the party of No.
It's the Chicago Way folks, you don't bring a Romney to a Gingrich fight.
"Romney is a smooth talker, but what did he actually accomplish as governor of Massachusetts, compared to what Gingrich accomplished as Speaker of the House? [...] Can you name one important positive thing that Romney accomplished as governor of Massachusetts? Can anyone? Does a candidate who represents the bland leading the bland increase the chances of victory in November 2012? A lot of candidates like that have lost, from Thomas E. Dewey to John McCain."
The babes section here is long overdue for some freshening up, so let's start 2012 off "right" with one of my favorite conservative babes S.E. Cupp.
Thirty two year old Sarah Elizabeth Cupp hails from Carlsbad California, and graduated from Cornell University with a degree in Art History. She went on to earn a master's degree in religious studies from New York University, which is remarkable, considering she is an atheist. Then again, I guess not all atheists hold religion and religious people in contempt, just the fanatical ones. Can atheists be zealots?
After being married for forty years, I took a careful look at my wife one day and said, “Forty years ago we had a cheap house, a junk car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a tiny black and white TV, but I got to go to bed every night with a hot twenty three year-old girl.
Now… I have a seven hundred thousand dollar home, a forty five thousand dollar car, a nice big bed with a large screen TV, but I’m sleeping with a sixty three year-old woman. It seems to me that you’re not holding up your side of things.”
My wife, being a reasonable woman told me to go out and find a hot twenty three year-old girl and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap house, driving a junk car, sleeping on a sofa bed watching a tiny black and white TV.”
Recent Comments